This lecture: HFT overview HFT definition: * Propreitary automated trading that occurs at speeds faster than an unaided human can achieve * Profits are inherently dependent on speed advantages * Propreitary as in: trade with one own's money Origins of HFT: * Initially, electronic or automated trading was prohibited. * Strange workarounds like the Clackatron. Initial electronic trading: * Automation of trading and exchanges * Island as an early example of electronic trading * Island was a machine friendly venue from the outset * Origin of the term HFT: Citadel in the early 2000s Speed advantages: * Initially, just the automation provided a speed advantage. * Later, needed to colocate within Island's building. * Next, needed to colocate within Island itself. * Example of Tradebot located in Kansas Scale of HFT: * Half of all trading in 2015 by soime measures: so, large by trading volume * Dominant in shares and futures, limited presence in treasuries, very little in forex HFT firms: * Small in size (150 is quite big) * Disproportionate share of trading volume relative to size * Geared towards rapid development of highly specialized software * More like a startup, than a large bank * But common to have multiple trading groups within a firm (will have more to say on this) Where HFT trading actually happens: * Datacenters in suburban areas (e.g., Chicago, NJ) * 2 dozen DCs host the vast majority of HFT * Most US share trading in 4 DCs in NJ The essence of HFT: * Simple signals * Relatively simple algorithms (some "taking" algorithms are more sophisticated and employ ML for predictions of stock prices) * When signals are common knowledge, speed is of essence. The book's central thesis: * Material political economy * Which I roughly read as the intersection of * technology * politics * economics The technology of HFT (we'll have a lot to say about this): * Co-location * Communication: communication vendors have now made it easier for startups to compete in the HFT space * Hardware * Breaking down abstraction boundaries: algorithms are super concrete now, no longer abstract * Distributed algorithms interacting with each other AND emergent behavior (Expand on these) * Sensing-to-actuation (or tick-to-trade) delay * It's all about low latency and every little detail matters HFT from a networked systems lens: * Interaction of many distributed algorithms * Latency of message passing is critical to mediating these interactions * At a very high level, similar to how distributed congestion control or route selection algorithms interact with each other * Many interesting examples of emergent behavior (Chapter 6) The politics of HFT: * Two notions of politics per Mackenzie --> Broad: Various actors in the ecosystem and their incentives; incumbent-challenger conflicts --> Narrow: political parties, members of Congress, hearings, govt. regulations * "Last look" as a political outcome * Roads not taken * RegNMS * The national best bid and offer * Intermarket sweep orders * Engineering vs. quantitative approaches to trading: making vs. taking * Political leanings of the government play a role as well: deregulation vs. regulation Economics of HFT: * Order books are visible to everyone * Was not always the case: historically, NASDAQ order books were visible only to specialists who could then talk about it informally. * Still not the case in dark pools * Probably 2B total in annual revenue across all HFT firms: so, small significant to the rest of finance * About 0.27 cents per trade is quite good, but this adds up across multiple trades * Revenue net of expenses of around 0.05 to 0.1 cents per trade is considered quite good. * Exchanges benefit from HFT (fees, etc.); HFT benefits from exchanges (colocation, better data etc.) * Exchanges often lease out communication links * Concept of rents and pinch points where people can charge unduly high costs Futures as an example of how politics affects HFT: * Futures initially restricted to agricultural commodities * Need to contemplate delivery in order to distinguish futures from gambling * Regulation and lobbying allowed futures to break the connection to contemplating delivery; head-on challenge may not have worked. * Some of this was connected to key changes in the US government. * Allowed more abstract concepts like futures on share indexes, futures on interest rates, etc. * Allowed a more expanded role for CME and for futures. * CME was also one of the early movers in electronic trading, e.g., GLOBEX Why futures lead: * Allow high leverage relative to other financial products because of low costs of trading on futures (page 43) * Stickiness of liquidity: the Chicago futures market has tended to be most liquid over the years Places where HFT has made limited inroads: * Good example of political considerations * HFT is in the inter-dealer market for treasuries * But clients still send orders directly to dealers * An all-to-all markets for treasuries in the same style as shares doesn't exist.